In comparing the two readings, Religion and Schools: The Debate Heats up 2009 and Library of Congress Artifact, I feel that one ruled against religion and one ruled in favor of religion. The ruling against the moment of silence ruled against religion. I am in favor of the moment of silence and I am glad that my school begins the day that way. We always say that you can choose to pray, reflect, or just sit for a moment of silence. When in the classroom I used the time to pray and if someone talked or did not observe the moment of silence I always asked them to "please do not interrupt my prayer". I'm sure the critics would say that I was incorporating religion into public education.
In Library of Congress Artifact the ruling in favor of freedom of speech over respect for a national symbol ruled in favor of religion. I think the students should not have had to go against their religion and salute but in my opinion standing without saying the pledge or saluting would not be idoltry. In my school we do require that everyone stand for the pledge, many choose not to participate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am a HUGE supporter of those who immigrate to the U.S. for a better life. My grandparents all came through Ellis Island. The difference then was that many immigrants wanted to become "American" and there were services available to assist them.
ReplyDeleteI think that my grandparents would be appalled if I refused to respect the 'new country.' ... not sure how others feel and what motivates them other than personal beliefs, religion, etc.